What does this Managers ranking show?

This ranking shows WA suburbs with the highest Managers worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.

Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.

Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.

What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.

← Managers

Occupation · WA · 100 suburbs

Top Suburbs by Managers Workers — WA

WA suburbs with the highest number of Managers managers workers, ranked by count from Census 2021.

Top suburb

Canning ValeWA

Leading count

2,007

% of population

5.8%

Source

ABS Census 2021

Ranking

Top Suburbs by Managers Workers

WA suburbs with the highest number of Managers managers workers, ranked by count from Census 2021. — WA

100 results

All NSW VIC QLD WA SA TAS ACT NT

How to read this ranking

Use top suburbs by managers workers to find workforce clusters, not finished shortlists.

BEST FOR

Finding suburbs with a strong concentration of one worker group.

This is useful when you want to see where a profession or worker cohort is clustered in WA.

READ IT AS

A scale signal, not a suburb score.

Worker counts reflect concentration and population scale. They should be read alongside housing costs, incomes, and access, not in isolation.

NEXT STEP

Validate whether the cluster actually fits your goal.

Move into suburb detail if you need to judge whether the area is investable, livable, or simply large enough to dominate a count-based list.

AVAILABLE evidence

Census concentration signal

This ranking is backed by demographic counts. It is good for finding clusters, not for deciding suburb quality alone.

CLUSTER SCREEN

This ranking finds concentration, not suburb quality.

Use top rows as research leads, then test affordability, services, and evidence depth before shortlisting.

Shortlist flow

Use #1 Canning Vale and #2 Baldivis as the first compare pair.

Rankings are strongest when they hand you a shortlist quickly. Compare the top two first, then open suburb detail if the head-to-head result still feels narrow.

Compare top 2Open #1 detail Open #2 detail

# ▲	SUBURB	STATE	COUNT	% OF POP	POP
1	Canning Vale	WA	2,007	5.8%	34,504
2	Baldivis	WA	1,882	5.0%	37,697
3	Scarborough	WA	1,586	9.0%	17,605
4	Dianella	WA	1,530	6.3%	24,169
5	Duncraig	WA	1,244	7.8%	15,982
6	Bayswater	WA	1,197	7.8%	15,288
7	Perth	WA	1,163	8.5%	13,670
8	South Perth	WA	1,149	9.1%	12,596
9	Como	WA	1,113	7.5%	14,786
10	Hillarys	WA	1,090	9.7%	11,200
11	Mount Lawley	WA	1,089	9.6%	11,328
12	East Perth	WA	1,075	9.2%	11,681
13	Morley	WA	1,070	4.7%	22,539
14	Ellenbrook	WA	1,059	4.3%	24,668
15	Landsdale	WA	992	6.4%	15,401
16	Willetton	WA	985	5.1%	19,262
17	Maylands	WA	984	7.5%	13,199
18	Wembley	WA	949	7.9%	12,061
19	North Perth	WA	911	9.5%	9,623
20	Floreat	WA	906	10.5%	8,621
21	Subiaco	WA	893	9.0%	9,940
22	Nedlands	WA	873	8.3%	10,561
23	Thornlie	WA	861	3.6%	23,665
24	Karrinyup	WA	845	8.5%	9,886
25	Yokine	WA	843	6.6%	12,706
26	Mosman Park	WA	836	9.1%	9,169
27	Piara Waters	WA	822	5.5%	15,029
28	Mount Hawthorn	WA	819	10.0%	8,183
29	Doubleview	WA	816	8.9%	9,205
30	Stirling	WA	815	8.0%	10,165
31	Ballajura	WA	811	4.4%	18,459
32	Byford	WA	810	4.3%	18,878
33	Claremont	WA	808	8.7%	9,248
34	Aveley	WA	801	5.7%	13,998
35	Cottesloe	WA	801	10.3%	7,750
36	Kingsley	WA	801	6.1%	13,204
37	East Victoria Park	WA	782	7.4%	10,569
38	East Fremantle	WA	772	9.9%	7,819
39	Secret Harbour	WA	768	6.2%	12,474
40	Southern River	WA	762	5.9%	12,852
41	Leeming	WA	750	6.9%	10,883
42	Fremantle	WA	740	8.0%	9,251
43	Applecross	WA	736	10.2%	7,228
44	Bassendean	WA	731	6.7%	10,837
45	City Beach	WA	718	10.6%	6,805
46	Rivervale	WA	714	6.6%	10,897
47	Mount Pleasant	WA	713	9.6%	7,456
48	Sorrento	WA	711	9.1%	7,795
49	Woodvale	WA	711	7.4%	9,579
50	Halls Head	WA	695	4.8%	14,474
51	Harrisdale	WA	683	5.9%	11,667
52	Success	WA	664	5.9%	11,340
53	Wembley Downs	WA	659	9.8%	6,743
54	Innaloo	WA	653	6.8%	9,592
55	Mindarie	WA	653	8.3%	7,867
56	Attadale	WA	651	9.8%	6,638
57	Ocean Reef	WA	651	8.0%	8,125
58	Victoria Park	WA	648	6.9%	9,334
59	Clarkson	WA	642	4.6%	13,904
60	Bicton	WA	640	9.2%	6,961
61	Rockingham	WA	635	4.1%	15,312
62	Wellard	WA	618	4.4%	14,127
63	Atwell	WA	617	6.6%	9,287
64	Carine	WA	614	8.4%	7,330
65	Wanneroo	WA	610	5.0%	12,113
66	Australind	WA	602	3.8%	15,988
67	Balcatta	WA	602	5.6%	10,813
68	Kardinya	WA	590	6.5%	9,137
69	Margaret River	WA	590	6.6%	8,918
70	Tapping	WA	589	6.2%	9,547
71	Greenwood	WA	582	5.9%	9,861
72	Forrestfield	WA	580	4.4%	13,181
73	Palmyra	WA	579	7.6%	7,585
74	Hamilton Hill	WA	576	5.1%	11,327
75	Nollamara	WA	575	4.5%	12,779
76	Butler	WA	572	4.2%	13,473
77	High Wycombe	WA	572	4.7%	12,198
78	Iluka	WA	563	9.9%	5,669
79	Melville	WA	553	8.9%	6,204
80	Spearwood	WA	552	5.0%	10,944
81	Lesmurdie	WA	546	6.5%	8,413
82	Port Kennedy	WA	542	4.0%	13,477
83	Padbury	WA	532	6.2%	8,626
84	Roleystone	WA	528	7.7%	6,848
85	Alkimos	WA	527	5.2%	10,203
86	Inglewood	WA	518	8.9%	5,837
87	West Perth	WA	518	8.5%	6,102
88	Beeliar	WA	512	5.9%	8,617
89	Quinns Rocks	WA	509	5.7%	8,861
90	Joondalup	WA	506	5.5%	9,193
91	Gosnells	WA	505	2.4%	21,149
92	Banksia Grove	WA	501	4.4%	11,351
93	Kalamunda	WA	501	7.0%	7,163
94	Madeley	WA	501	7.4%	6,805
95	Swanbourne	WA	498	10.8%	4,592
96	The Vines	WA	495	8.5%	5,848
97	Mount Claremont	WA	485	9.7%	4,999
98	Darch	WA	482	6.6%	7,347
99	Waikiki	WA	473	3.8%	12,453
100	Mullaloo	WA	469	7.6%	6,190

FAQ

Top Suburbs by Managers Workers FAQ

What does this Managers ranking show?

This ranking shows WA suburbs with the highest Managers worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.
Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.
Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.
What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.