What does this Managers ranking show?

This ranking shows TAS suburbs with the highest Managers worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.

Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.

Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.

What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.

← Managers

Occupation · TAS · 100 suburbs

Top Suburbs by Managers Workers — TAS

TAS suburbs with the highest number of Managers managers workers, ranked by count from Census 2021.

Top suburb

Sandy BayTAS

Leading count

957

% of population

7.8%

Source

ABS Census 2021

Ranking

Top Suburbs by Managers Workers

TAS suburbs with the highest number of Managers managers workers, ranked by count from Census 2021. — TAS

100 results

All NSW VIC QLD WA SA TAS ACT NT

How to read this ranking

Use top suburbs by managers workers to find workforce clusters, not finished shortlists.

BEST FOR

Finding suburbs with a strong concentration of one worker group.

This is useful when you want to see where a profession or worker cohort is clustered in TAS.

READ IT AS

A scale signal, not a suburb score.

Worker counts reflect concentration and population scale. They should be read alongside housing costs, incomes, and access, not in isolation.

NEXT STEP

Validate whether the cluster actually fits your goal.

Move into suburb detail if you need to judge whether the area is investable, livable, or simply large enough to dominate a count-based list.

AVAILABLE evidence

Census concentration signal

This ranking is backed by demographic counts. It is good for finding clusters, not for deciding suburb quality alone.

CLUSTER SCREEN

This ranking finds concentration, not suburb quality.

Use top rows as research leads, then test affordability, services, and evidence depth before shortlisting.

Shortlist flow

Use #1 Sandy Bay and #2 Kingston as the first compare pair.

Rankings are strongest when they hand you a shortlist quickly. Compare the top two first, then open suburb detail if the head-to-head result still feels narrow.

Compare top 2Open #1 detail Open #2 detail

# ▲	SUBURB	STATE	COUNT	% OF POP	POP
1	Sandy Bay	TAS	957	7.8%	12,315
2	Kingston	TAS	739	6.0%	12,288
3	Howrah	TAS	601	6.3%	9,545
4	Devonport	TAS	574	4.0%	14,481
5	Blackmans Bay	TAS	561	7.3%	7,688
6	West Hobart	TAS	557	8.5%	6,525
7	Lenah Valley	TAS	467	7.2%	6,522
8	New Town	TAS	439	6.5%	6,781
9	Glenorchy	TAS	414	3.4%	12,013
10	Riverside	TAS	411	5.6%	7,326
11	Lindisfarne	TAS	407	6.1%	6,639
12	South Hobart	TAS	401	6.8%	5,886
13	Newstead	TAS	395	7.0%	5,617
14	Bellerive	TAS	334	6.8%	4,945
15	Trevallyn	TAS	319	6.6%	4,826
16	Claremont	TAS	306	3.6%	8,397
17	Legana	TAS	292	6.2%	4,719
18	Old Beach	TAS	291	6.6%	4,394
19	West Launceston	TAS	291	6.7%	4,316
20	Newnham	TAS	290	4.1%	7,073
21	Prospect Vale	TAS	288	5.3%	5,433
22	Margate	TAS	283	6.7%	4,239
23	South Launceston	TAS	274	5.6%	4,894
24	Wynyard	TAS	268	4.3%	6,296
25	Moonah	TAS	263	4.5%	5,884
26	Ulverstone	TAS	263	4.0%	6,653
27	Latrobe	TAS	247	4.9%	5,030
28	Launceston	TAS	241	7.7%	3,110
29	Taroona	TAS	237	7.6%	3,121
30	Kings Meadows	TAS	236	5.4%	4,359
31	Longford	TAS	234	5.5%	4,268
32	Smithton	TAS	232	5.9%	3,934
33	Acton Park	TAS	227	9.9%	2,293
34	Tranmere	TAS	225	10.1%	2,218
35	Penguin	TAS	222	5.4%	4,132
36	Brighton	TAS	220	4.4%	4,983
37	Youngtown	TAS	218	5.1%	4,315
38	Deloraine	TAS	210	6.9%	3,035
39	West Moonah	TAS	210	4.6%	4,522
40	Mount Stuart	TAS	205	8.4%	2,444
41	Geilston Bay	TAS	201	5.8%	3,461
42	Sorell	TAS	198	5.5%	3,597
43	Hobart	TAS	197	5.8%	3,390
44	Perth	TAS	196	5.6%	3,472
45	North Hobart	TAS	193	7.4%	2,600
46	East Launceston	TAS	192	8.5%	2,270
47	Lauderdale	TAS	191	7.4%	2,592
48	Midway Point	TAS	191	5.6%	3,384
49	New Norfolk	TAS	191	3.2%	6,037
50	Battery Point	TAS	190	9.1%	2,096
51	Norwood	TAS	182	4.7%	3,869
52	Mount Nelson	TAS	178	6.5%	2,749
53	West Ulverstone	TAS	178	3.9%	4,515
54	Kingston Beach	TAS	170	7.4%	2,305
55	Invermay	TAS	159	4.5%	3,498
56	Park Grove	TAS	155	5.9%	2,613
57	Richmond	TAS	150	9.5%	1,583
58	Huonville	TAS	149	5.0%	3,002
59	Sandford	TAS	149	7.3%	2,046
60	Summerhill	TAS	149	4.7%	3,139
61	Dodges Ferry	TAS	146	5.5%	2,646
62	Berriedale	TAS	140	4.8%	2,905
63	Granton	TAS	139	7.3%	1,903
64	Rokeby	TAS	139	3.3%	4,211
65	Rosetta	TAS	138	4.9%	2,833
66	Bridport	TAS	136	7.8%	1,742
67	Seven Mile Beach	TAS	134	9.1%	1,467
68	East Devonport	TAS	133	3.0%	4,384
69	Oakdowns	TAS	132	7.0%	1,897
70	Lutana	TAS	131	5.0%	2,616
71	Cambridge	TAS	130	8.9%	1,454
72	Somerset	TAS	129	3.2%	4,067
73	Port Sorell	TAS	125	5.6%	2,221
74	Austins Ferry	TAS	124	5.2%	2,395
75	Westbury	TAS	124	5.5%	2,272
76	Hadspen	TAS	120	4.9%	2,429
77	Cressy	TAS	119	10.4%	1,149
78	Scottsdale	TAS	119	4.9%	2,408
79	St Leonards	TAS	119	5.1%	2,351
80	Dynnyrne	TAS	117	7.2%	1,633
81	Mowbray	TAS	116	2.9%	4,048
82	St Helens	TAS	110	5.0%	2,206
83	Prospect	TAS	109	5.7%	1,908
84	Evandale	TAS	106	8.4%	1,265
85	Mornington	TAS	106	4.3%	2,469
86	George Town	TAS	104	2.3%	4,536
87	Turners Beach	TAS	99	5.0%	1,966
88	Blackstone Heights	TAS	97	7.8%	1,245
89	Montrose	TAS	95	4.1%	2,313
90	Cygnet	TAS	94	5.4%	1,742
91	Shearwater	TAS	92	4.5%	2,051
92	Spreyton	TAS	91	4.9%	1,876
93	Campania	TAS	88	7.6%	1,158
94	Ranelagh	TAS	88	5.9%	1,484
95	Relbia	TAS	87	12.6%	691
96	Geeveston	TAS	86	6.0%	1,431
97	Romaine	TAS	86	4.6%	1,850
98	Tolmans Hill	TAS	86	13.3%	647
99	Rose Bay	TAS	84	7.1%	1,188
100	Bicheno	TAS	83	7.9%	1,049

FAQ

Top Suburbs by Managers Workers FAQ

What does this Managers ranking show?

This ranking shows TAS suburbs with the highest Managers worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.
Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.
Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.
What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.