What does this Accommodation & Food ranking show?

This ranking shows TAS suburbs with the highest Accommodation & Food worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.

Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.

Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.

What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.

← Accommodation & Food

Industry · TAS · 100 suburbs

Top Suburbs by Accommodation & Food Workers — TAS

TAS suburbs with the highest number of Accommodation & Food accommodation & food workers, ranked by count from Census 2021.

Top suburb

Sandy BayTAS

Leading count

754

% of population

6.1%

Source

ABS Census 2021

Ranking

Top Suburbs by Accommodation & Food Workers

TAS suburbs with the highest number of Accommodation & Food accommodation & food workers, ranked by count from Census 2021. — TAS

100 results

All NSW VIC QLD WA SA TAS ACT NT

How to read this ranking

Use top suburbs by accommodation & food workers to locate employment clusters before deeper suburb work.

BEST FOR

Seeing where an industry has a visible local employment base.

This helps when you want a fast read on where one industry is concentrated in TAS.

READ IT AS

A local employment footprint, not a full market verdict.

Employment counts say something about local economic shape, but they do not tell you on their own whether prices, rents, or amenities make the area attractive.

NEXT STEP

Cross-check with prices and household data.

Use the ranking to narrow the field, then verify affordability, demand, schools, and transport before treating the area as a serious candidate.

AVAILABLE evidence

Census concentration signal

This ranking is backed by demographic counts. It is good for finding clusters, not for deciding suburb quality alone.

CLUSTER SCREEN

This ranking finds concentration, not suburb quality.

Use top rows as research leads, then test affordability, services, and evidence depth before shortlisting.

Shortlist flow

Use #1 Sandy Bay and #2 Glenorchy as the first compare pair.

Rankings are strongest when they hand you a shortlist quickly. Compare the top two first, then open suburb detail if the head-to-head result still feels narrow.

Compare top 2Open #1 detail Open #2 detail

# ▲	SUBURB	STATE	COUNT	% OF POP	POP
1	Sandy Bay	TAS	754	6.1%	12,315
2	Glenorchy	TAS	530	4.4%	12,013
3	Kingston	TAS	516	4.2%	12,288
4	Devonport	TAS	478	3.3%	14,481
5	West Hobart	TAS	351	5.4%	6,525
6	Moonah	TAS	348	5.9%	5,884
7	New Town	TAS	340	5.0%	6,781
8	Newnham	TAS	299	4.2%	7,073
9	Riverside	TAS	295	4.0%	7,326
10	Howrah	TAS	290	3.0%	9,545
11	Hobart	TAS	280	8.3%	3,390
12	Blackmans Bay	TAS	261	3.4%	7,688
13	South Hobart	TAS	261	4.4%	5,886
14	Lenah Valley	TAS	255	3.9%	6,522
15	West Moonah	TAS	244	5.4%	4,522
16	Lindisfarne	TAS	229	3.4%	6,639
17	Claremont	TAS	226	2.7%	8,397
18	North Hobart	TAS	218	8.4%	2,600
19	South Launceston	TAS	210	4.3%	4,894
20	Newstead	TAS	203	3.6%	5,617
21	Trevallyn	TAS	200	4.1%	4,826
22	Mowbray	TAS	199	4.9%	4,048
23	Launceston	TAS	195	6.3%	3,110
24	Ulverstone	TAS	195	2.9%	6,653
25	Invermay	TAS	184	5.3%	3,498
26	Bellerive	TAS	182	3.7%	4,945
27	Kings Meadows	TAS	169	3.9%	4,359
28	West Launceston	TAS	167	3.9%	4,316
29	Prospect Vale	TAS	163	3.0%	5,433
30	New Norfolk	TAS	161	2.7%	6,037
31	Youngtown	TAS	159	3.7%	4,315
32	Brighton	TAS	155	3.1%	4,983
33	Wynyard	TAS	152	2.4%	6,296
34	Coles Bay	TAS	147	28.5%	515
35	Lutana	TAS	143	5.5%	2,616
36	West Ulverstone	TAS	143	3.2%	4,515
37	Rokeby	TAS	140	3.3%	4,211
38	Latrobe	TAS	139	2.8%	5,030
39	East Devonport	TAS	137	3.1%	4,384
40	Legana	TAS	135	2.9%	4,719
41	Battery Point	TAS	134	6.4%	2,096
42	East Launceston	TAS	133	5.9%	2,270
43	Penguin	TAS	126	3.0%	4,132
44	George Town	TAS	121	2.7%	4,536
45	Smithton	TAS	117	3.0%	3,934
46	Mount Stuart	TAS	115	4.7%	2,444
47	Margate	TAS	114	2.7%	4,239
48	Bridgewater	TAS	112	2.4%	4,592
49	Old Beach	TAS	110	2.5%	4,394
50	Bicheno	TAS	108	10.3%	1,049
51	Ravenswood	TAS	107	2.8%	3,804
52	Deloraine	TAS	106	3.5%	3,035
53	Dynnyrne	TAS	105	6.4%	1,633
54	Sorell	TAS	104	2.9%	3,597
55	St Helens	TAS	104	4.7%	2,206
56	Geilston Bay	TAS	101	2.9%	3,461
57	Summerhill	TAS	101	3.2%	3,139
58	Norwood	TAS	99	2.6%	3,869
59	Perth	TAS	98	2.8%	3,472
60	Berriedale	TAS	95	3.3%	2,905
61	Kingston Beach	TAS	95	4.1%	2,305
62	Warrane	TAS	95	3.5%	2,695
63	Mornington	TAS	93	3.8%	2,469
64	Rosetta	TAS	93	3.3%	2,833
65	Mount Nelson	TAS	92	3.3%	2,749
66	Longford	TAS	91	2.1%	4,268
67	Park Grove	TAS	90	3.4%	2,613
68	Swansea	TAS	90	9.0%	997
69	Taroona	TAS	89	2.9%	3,121
70	Midway Point	TAS	87	2.6%	3,384
71	Chigwell	TAS	86	4.2%	2,050
72	Montrose	TAS	81	3.5%	2,313
73	Bridport	TAS	80	4.6%	1,742
74	Prospect	TAS	78	4.1%	1,908
75	Queenstown	TAS	77	4.3%	1,808
76	Scottsdale	TAS	72	3.0%	2,408
77	Strahan	TAS	72	10.3%	697
78	Westbury	TAS	72	3.2%	2,272
79	Cradle Mountain	TAS	71	46.7%	152
80	Dodges Ferry	TAS	69	2.6%	2,646
81	Shorewell Park	TAS	67	3.1%	2,150
82	St Leonards	TAS	67	2.8%	2,351
83	Austins Ferry	TAS	66	2.8%	2,395
84	Port Sorell	TAS	65	2.9%	2,221
85	Hadspen	TAS	64	2.6%	2,429
86	Risdon Vale	TAS	63	2.0%	3,171
87	Upper Burnie	TAS	63	3.3%	1,891
88	Sheffield	TAS	61	3.8%	1,602
89	Lauderdale	TAS	60	2.3%	2,592
90	Oakdowns	TAS	60	3.2%	1,897
91	Acton Park	TAS	59	2.6%	2,293
92	Glebe	TAS	57	10.0%	570
93	Shearwater	TAS	57	2.8%	2,051
94	Miandetta	TAS	56	3.1%	1,822
95	Mayfield	TAS	54	3.5%	1,525
96	Romaine	TAS	54	2.9%	1,850
97	Tranmere	TAS	54	2.4%	2,218
98	Spreyton	TAS	52	2.8%	1,876
99	Stanley	TAS	52	8.7%	595
100	Goodwood	TAS	51	4.5%	1,142

FAQ

Top Suburbs by Accommodation & Food Workers FAQ

What does this Accommodation & Food ranking show?

This ranking shows TAS suburbs with the highest Accommodation & Food worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.
Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.
Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.
What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.