What does this Transport & Logistics ranking show?

This ranking shows WA suburbs with the highest Transport & Logistics worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.

Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.

Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.

What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.

← Transport & Logistics

Industry · WA · 100 suburbs

Top Suburbs by Transport & Logistics Workers — WA

WA suburbs with the highest number of Transport & Logistics transport & logistics workers, ranked by count from Census 2021.

Top suburb

Canning ValeWA

Leading count

1,048

% of population

3.0%

Source

ABS Census 2021

Ranking

Top Suburbs by Transport & Logistics Workers

WA suburbs with the highest number of Transport & Logistics transport & logistics workers, ranked by count from Census 2021. — WA

100 results

All NSW VIC QLD WA SA TAS ACT NT

How to read this ranking

Use top suburbs by transport & logistics workers to locate employment clusters before deeper suburb work.

BEST FOR

Seeing where an industry has a visible local employment base.

This helps when you want a fast read on where one industry is concentrated in WA.

READ IT AS

A local employment footprint, not a full market verdict.

Employment counts say something about local economic shape, but they do not tell you on their own whether prices, rents, or amenities make the area attractive.

NEXT STEP

Cross-check with prices and household data.

Use the ranking to narrow the field, then verify affordability, demand, schools, and transport before treating the area as a serious candidate.

AVAILABLE evidence

Census concentration signal

This ranking is backed by demographic counts. It is good for finding clusters, not for deciding suburb quality alone.

CLUSTER SCREEN

This ranking finds concentration, not suburb quality.

Use top rows as research leads, then test affordability, services, and evidence depth before shortlisting.

Shortlist flow

Use #1 Canning Vale and #2 Thornlie as the first compare pair.

Rankings are strongest when they hand you a shortlist quickly. Compare the top two first, then open suburb detail if the head-to-head result still feels narrow.

Compare top 2Open #1 detail Open #2 detail

# ▲	SUBURB	STATE	COUNT	% OF POP	POP
1	Canning Vale	WA	1,048	3.0%	34,504
2	Thornlie	WA	786	3.3%	23,665
3	Ellenbrook	WA	759	3.1%	24,668
4	Gosnells	WA	679	3.2%	21,149
5	Byford	WA	649	3.4%	18,878
6	Morley	WA	624	2.8%	22,539
7	Forrestfield	WA	613	4.7%	13,181
8	High Wycombe	WA	600	4.9%	12,198
9	Piara Waters	WA	507	3.4%	15,029
10	Ballajura	WA	503	2.7%	18,459
11	South Hedland	WA	499	4.5%	11,046
12	Aveley	WA	469	3.4%	13,998
13	Balga	WA	469	3.4%	13,864
14	Maddington	WA	460	3.7%	12,419
15	Seville Grove	WA	410	3.6%	11,408
16	Harrisdale	WA	408	3.5%	11,667
17	Nollamara	WA	402	3.1%	12,779
18	Brabham	WA	382	4.4%	8,665
19	Armadale	WA	339	2.5%	13,415
20	Beckenham	WA	336	3.7%	9,092
21	Queens Park	WA	330	4.5%	7,268
22	Huntingdale	WA	326	3.6%	9,021
23	Cannington	WA	317	4.6%	6,875
24	Cloverdale	WA	305	3.4%	8,864
25	Spearwood	WA	301	2.8%	10,944
26	Bentley	WA	298	3.3%	9,051
27	Kelmscott	WA	294	2.8%	10,575
28	Kewdale	WA	288	3.9%	7,397
29	Port Hedland	WA	283	6.9%	4,081
30	East Cannington	WA	272	4.2%	6,512
31	Dayton	WA	270	4.9%	5,507
32	Marangaroo	WA	268	2.6%	10,483
33	Beechboro	WA	265	2.9%	9,112
34	Caversham	WA	258	3.5%	7,419
35	Wattle Grove	WA	251	3.8%	6,547
36	Swan View	WA	249	3.2%	7,889
37	Belmont	WA	245	3.5%	6,959
38	Bertram	WA	232	3.7%	6,196
39	Westminster	WA	217	3.1%	7,042
40	Maida Vale	WA	214	4.8%	4,499
41	Yangebup	WA	212	2.8%	7,631
42	Kenwick	WA	211	3.7%	5,684
43	Bennett Springs	WA	199	3.4%	5,929
44	South Lake	WA	193	3.3%	5,831
45	Mirrabooka	WA	186	2.3%	8,000
46	Wilson	WA	186	2.8%	6,608
47	Bullsbrook	WA	185	3.3%	5,605
48	Castletown	WA	183	4.6%	3,968
49	Langford	WA	182	3.3%	5,505
50	Cable Beach	WA	179	3.1%	5,730
51	Redcliffe	WA	176	3.5%	5,030
52	Girrawheen	WA	175	2.0%	8,897
53	Hilbert	WA	170	4.1%	4,165
54	Greenfields	WA	167	1.7%	9,869
55	Midland	WA	165	2.6%	6,335
56	Parmelia	WA	157	2.5%	6,184
57	South Guildford	WA	150	4.0%	3,781
58	Northam	WA	149	2.2%	6,679
59	Exmouth	WA	148	5.3%	2,806
60	Boulder	WA	145	3.0%	4,872
61	Kununurra	WA	144	2.6%	5,494
62	Camillo	WA	140	3.2%	4,442
63	Nickol	WA	139	2.8%	4,938
64	Baynton	WA	138	3.1%	4,496
65	Helena Valley	WA	133	3.2%	4,130
66	Wandina	WA	133	3.0%	4,375
67	Jane Brook	WA	128	3.5%	3,670
68	South Kalgoorlie	WA	126	2.9%	4,416
69	Somerville	WA	121	2.9%	4,165
70	Stratton	WA	121	3.7%	3,267
71	Djugun	WA	108	3.3%	3,291
72	Koondoola	WA	106	2.7%	3,919
73	Broome	WA	105	2.8%	3,797
74	Middle Swan	WA	101	3.5%	2,852
75	Bulgarra	WA	100	3.3%	2,990
76	Carey Park	WA	100	1.9%	5,155
77	Mount Tarcoola	WA	99	3.0%	3,257
78	Leda	WA	96	3.0%	3,202
79	Oakford	WA	96	3.4%	2,803
80	Lockridge	WA	92	2.8%	3,322
81	Merredin	WA	92	3.5%	2,604
82	Midvale	WA	88	3.9%	2,283
83	Mount Helena	WA	88	2.6%	3,373
84	Waggrakine	WA	87	3.2%	2,679
85	Mount Nasura	WA	86	2.9%	2,997
86	Haynes	WA	83	3.4%	2,417
87	Henley Brook	WA	81	3.2%	2,500
88	Erskine	WA	78	1.4%	5,429
89	Narrogin	WA	78	2.0%	3,927
90	Greenmount	WA	75	2.8%	2,666
91	Hannans	WA	73	3.0%	2,410
92	Pegs Creek	WA	73	3.6%	2,050
93	Brookdale	WA	72	2.4%	2,968
94	Esperance	WA	70	3.4%	2,080
95	Glendalough	WA	70	2.7%	2,628
96	Dampier	WA	69	5.4%	1,282
97	Serpentine	WA	69	2.4%	2,863
98	Woorree	WA	69	5.3%	1,295
99	West Beach	WA	68	4.6%	1,483
100	Geraldton	WA	67	2.1%	3,246

FAQ

Top Suburbs by Transport & Logistics Workers FAQ

What does this Transport & Logistics ranking show?

This ranking shows WA suburbs with the highest Transport & Logistics worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.
Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.
Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.
What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.